feat: support multi regions on datanode

[v0y4g3r]

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA

What's changed and what's your intention?

Support mutliple regions on datanode.

Checklist

• [X] I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
• [ ] I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

Fixes #625

[v0y4g3r]

This feature requires refactor gRPC services using Arrow Flight.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #653 (df6a78a) into develop (b0925d9) will decrease coverage by 0.14%. The diff coverage is 87.01%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #653      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    85.88%   85.75%   -0.14%     
===========================================
  Files          443      443              
  Lines        59202    59292      +90     
===========================================
- Hits         50848    50846       -2     
- Misses        8354     8446      +92     

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust	85.75% <87.01%> (-0.14%)	:arrow_down:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/catalog/src/lib.rs	85.89% <0.00%> (-2.72%)	:arrow_down:
src/catalog/src/local/manager.rs	69.77% <ø> (+0.17%)	:arrow_up:
src/catalog/src/remote/manager.rs	68.13% <ø> (+0.11%)	:arrow_up:
src/mito/src/error.rs	70.96% <0.00%> (-4.90%)	:arrow_down:
src/partition/src/error.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/table/src/error.rs	87.87% <0.00%> (-1.36%)	:arrow_down:
src/table/src/requests.rs	66.66% <ø> (ø)
src/mito/src/table.rs	88.60% <82.05%> (-3.02%)	:arrow_down:
src/mito/src/engine.rs	98.38% <92.23%> (-0.53%)	:arrow_down:
src/frontend/src/table.rs	94.08% <92.85%> (-0.07%)	:arrow_down:
... and 33 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[MichaelScofield]

seems this PR contains the changes in https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb/pull/906 ?

[v0y4g3r]

seems this PR contains the changes in #906 ?

Maybe I should get #906 merged first to reduce size of this PR.

[killme2008]

We need to find a way to pass region filters to datanode through substrait plans so that we don't have to iterate all regions on some datanode.

Can we create an issue to track this?

[v0y4g3r]

We need to find a way to pass region filters to datanode through substrait plans so that we don't have to iterate all regions on some datanode.

Can we create an issue to track this?

I created #926