Imms .NET 2.0 Compatibility

Any plans for this?

Apr 29 '16 15:04 sungiant

I've not heard of anyone still using .NET 2.0 for quite a long time - any particular reason you're still using that? Just wondering, thanks

Apr 29 '16 15:04 dsyme

@dsyme I'm guessing it's some legacy environment. I don't think anyone would actually use it of their own volition :smile:

@sungiant Not really. It's possible to lower the framework version to 3.5 Client Profile, if there's a demand for that, but some parts of the library have tons of LINQ in them (not the performant parts, of course). It'd be quite a bit of work.

Apr 30 '16 10:04 GregRos

Unity3D is still running .NET 2.0: http://docs.unity3d.com/410/Documentation/ScriptReference/MonoCompatibility.html

Apr 30 '16 16:04 sungiant

@sungiant, what Unity says is ".NET 2.0" actually has a number of 3.5 features, like System.Linq. From my experience, assemblies compiled for 3.5 usually run fine on Unity. I'll try to work on 3.5 compatibility if I have time. Will probably need to set up some kind of build system.

May 01 '16 17:05 GregRos