Greelan
Greelan
> @Greelan Added some additional commits, but why delete the SIT Extra files deletion step? Because DeleteAfterExtract in the SIT download stage does the job xD
> @Greelan > > Possibly they should be TCP only but the devs did not specify on their requirements page. I figured both was the safest. Let me attempt to...
Closing this as it is not capable of being merged and has a number of configuration issues. A working template is in my dev branch, which I will eventually include...
No idea whether it needed to include older versions, since I have never played this game xD SIT should be easier as you could potentially use FetchURLFromJQ and the GH...
BTW,what's the purpose in having the start/wait/stop update stages?
One of those crappy downloads, huh? This is a bit problematic though, as if you have two servers, one on default, presumably the first-time startup of the second server will...
OK that's probably OK then. Tho you will likely have unnecessary support queries xD I suspect since SIT generates these files that any new additions would likely be added on...
Why not go the route that is done for other templates - eg for dotnet or node or BepInEx or a range of others - that have a text field...
Sure but with a link and instructions it shouldn't be hard. Many templates have this. Otherwise, will you stick around to update the template every couple of days? XD
> > Sure but with a link and instructions it shouldn't be hard. Many templates have this. Otherwise, will you stick around to update the template every couple of days?...