Vertex AI Experiments - Model training - Notebook review

[inardini]

If you are opening a PR for Official Notebooks under the notebooks/official folder, follow this mandatory checklist:

• [x] Use the notebook template as a starting point.
• [x] Follow the style and grammar rules outlined in the above notebook template.
• [x] Verify the notebook runs successfully in Colab since the automated tests cannot guarantee this even when it passes.
• [x] Passes all the required automated checks. You can locally test for formatting and linting with these instructions.
• [x] You have consulted with a tech writer to see if tech writer review is necessary. If so, the notebook has been reviewed by a tech writer, and they have approved it.
• [x] This notebook has been added to the CODEOWNERS file under the Official Notebooks section, pointing to the author or the author's team.
• [x] The Jupyter notebook cleans up any artifacts it has created (datasets, ML models, endpoints, etc) so as not to eat up unnecessary resources.

[review-notebook-app[bot]]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[inardini]

Ready to be reviewed. Notice that the PR consider two files even if build_model_experimentation_lineage_with_prebuild_code.ipynb is the one to update. For some reason the linter code consider both of files when I launch it. Any ideas?

[inardini]

Ready to be reviewed