GolfingSuccess

In that sense, a quick with syntax `(A)(B)(Q)`, where Q is the quick, that would be equivalent to `(A)€(B)/(C)`, where C is one of `¤$¥` corresponding to the arity of...

@lynn [My newest example](https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/163148/41024) as of writing this. `Dḟ0P+Ʋ⁸С€f/` can be written as `Dḟ0P+Ʋ⁸Сf(Q)` instead, if Q is single-byte. Oh, and, if we want `(A)Ѐ(B)/(C)` too, we could make `(A)(B)(ÐQ)`....

I suggest making `œṠ` to act more like`y`, i.e. `[x1, x2, x3, x4]` would substitute `x1` with `x2` and `x3` with `x4`, with earlier matches having priority.

@ruds I don't think that's applicable at all for bases over 250, but, for [2, 250], it would have surely been handy. We already have a built-in for bijective base-250...

@DennisMitchell Hmm... and that's why I struggle with Jelly. @ConorOBrien-Foxx Just a question: have you made the layout yet? Because I desparately need it, I can't use the Compose Key...

@ChaosCat (May not be ordered with most common symbols yet) | Key | Ctrl + Key | | :-: | :-: | | 1 | ! | | 2 |...

@ChaosCat Of course combination characters are invalid. I tried to avoid Alt. The (upper dot) and (lower dot) are meant to be modifier combinations that must be followed by another...

@ChaosCat Well, you _have_ to implement the modification characters, or the project is just waste that needs to be dumped away. I guess that Shift and Alt do not use...

@ChaosCat Please allow normal ()? if you can. Also, I think the upper dot can do L too (it's just that L/l have a middle dot, not an upper one)....

@ChaosCat ɠƈø are still missing though :( Yes, I still insist. I insist, for a better layout. Please do not take this personally. I like how the €Þ¥ØÆßðƓ£ÇÑ are put.