Guillaume Giudicelli
Guillaume Giudicelli
@cpgr did you want a review on this? Is there any task left to do?
@ishita-trivedi @joshua-smandych for awareness. I don't have the others' git handles
> Regarding materials: I am not sure if/how you want us to change anything here right now or if you would prefer we wait on that. I think we should...
> Or should we just use a new name (like is suggested https://github.com/idaholab/moose/pull/30860#discussion_r2174071735)? This could be a good idea. Basically those cells are the "physical" cells as opposed to cells...
> If we take this concept one step further and want to connect the CSG to some downstream tally system, Right that is part of the problem. We likely want...
I met with the INL Griffin team. They overall agreed with the idea that this unique material ID used in CSG (+ cell id) by MC codes will best be...
Is this a tough one to rebase (lots of conflicts)? If so merge commit is fine but if not rebasing is preferred
It's good to go for me. @roystgnr @loganharbour @lindsayad this is the PR I mentioned if you want to take a look
The CSGBase (and surface and etc) stuff may not need the mesh generator system classes to exist to be created in unit tests We don't need to be unit testing...
I can work on this unless someone wants it more than me