Leo Wandersleb

Results 159 comments of Leo Wandersleb

So is this meant to help with sharding later on? This relay for kinds x to y, this relay for nwiki, ... ? But any pubkey could advertise any such...

I find the rules quite complex and doubt many clients will implement all of it. I agree with @Cameri to not use `#`. (I don't agree with dropping `!` and...

This nip requires to know which relay the recipient can be reached at. Damus clients for example only talk to damus relay I think. So while challenge and response could...

May a "REQ" query contain extra parameters? `{"kinds": [4],"authors": ["aeae"], "nip-21-ts":"", "nip-21-sig":signatureOf("identifying myself as for relay at ")}`. It would leave the channel name alone. That said, I am still...

@phyro currently, authentication is not really a thing yet with relays. They generously deliver upon any anonymous request. Some require registration though in order to **send** events. @fiatjaf this nip...

@phyro relays already hold "sessions" per client as the clients remain connected for long times. Each relay implementation already has to have some object where it stores the client's filters...

@phyro signature aggregation is off the table for this one I think. Sorry I started this topic here. Most users won't need it anyway. This can be introduced in a...

Should the nip define how relays should behave if the identification is missing? I think the unaware client would be confused to see no kind-4 events at all on a...

Is there any update on this? You say the hooks have an impact? If I have 5000 objects and only want to add those to the DB that have no...

I'm unaware of any relevance given to the value of a transaction in the process of mining since priority was removed. Neither do I see any importance to such a...