Ghostkeeper

I'm pretty sure that the extruder naming is not an issue here. The output of Cura is still `T0` and `T1`, regardless of what the extruder names are (1 and...

It's most likely either: * the configuration in the printer definition doesn't match what Flashprint expects (e.g. steps per mm), or * some bug in GPX that does the conversion....

Sorry, this got moved to the background as I was very busy the past few weeks. Back now. I've tried to reproduce this issue but FlashForge doesn't seem to want...

I see what you mean with the jaggedness:  However I think this is just a result of the visualisation of FlashPrint. They use cuboids with rectangular corners, while Cura...

That depends if Octoprint is calling GPX the same way I guess. Maybe my plug-in isn't providing the nozzle temperature correctly if a GPX profile is being used?

I'm unable to reproduce this problem. The plug-in seems to load fine in Cura 4.5. As you can see I saved a .x3g file here:  Are you sure you've...

> screen images show that the file name is some sort of temp name That's probably because this plug-in writes it to a temporary file, because GPX requires a file...

I don't know of a good way to decode X3G files to see if it's instructing the printer to heat... :cry: It's not a plaintext format, and no slicer seems...

I've used FlashForge in the past too to visualise it (this post is really quite old) but in its current form (v4.6.0) FlashForge seems to just display a bunch of...

Oh, okay. That would probably be good for me to document, then. Thanks.