Georgi N. Boshnakov
Georgi N. Boshnakov
`Rdpack 2.2` (now on CRAN) fixes this issue. It shouldn't matter which version of `R` is used to build a package, as long as the developer builds their package with...
It seems that I was too quick to publish the fix. At the same time I reported a bug(let) in R-devel and they fixed it (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2022-March/081570.html) but now if the...
I reverted the change in Rdpack `v2.2`, since after the above mentioned fix in R-devel it is not necessary and may not render the doi's. It looks fine but I...
`Rdpack v2.3` is on CRAN and reverts the changes in v2.2. As long as a package is not built with v2.2 it should be fine on CRAN but it is...
Thanks for the report. You are right. The message is confusing and should be fixed with something more suitable.
Please note that your input `bibtex` entry is invalid - for entries of type `inproceedings` the field `booktitle` is compulsory for the standard `bibtex` styles. Also, I am surprised that...
Indeed, after removing the indent before \code{yyy}, as you suggested: ``` \value{ Note that \code{xxx} by default drops \code{yyy}, etc. } ``` there is no break before yyy: ``` Note...
Thanks for the report. It doesn't matter if it is in Rdpack or downstream, I will chase it down.
This seems to happen in html but not in pdf, am I right?
For the previous comment, I was looking at the pages created by pkgdown, where I observed the redundant spaces before the final full stop. On the other hand, the rendered...