sbt-vuefy
sbt-vuefy copied to clipboard
GIVESocialMovement
Cannot compile project
Looks like an interesting project but I cannot compile the test project. The error reads -
error: not found: value SbtVuefy
This has brought up other errors on the build as doesn't recognise Assets or VueKeys. So it seems that the SBT files aren't available for some reason. The build/spec is the same of course, i.e. Scala 2.12.8 / SBT 1.2.8 / Play 2.7.3. I've read this similar issue - but it didn't help. To note: I used npm install instead of yarn install as I wasn't able to install yarn with the error -
'yarn' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
Hopefully that's not an issue. Any help/guidance is greatly appreciated! _
Using yarn or npm shouldn't matter here.
Is it possible to share your project somewhere? Is it the exact test project here: https://github.com/GIVESocialMovement/sbt-vuefy/tree/master/test-play-project
Actually I had to grab a new Play seed and then copy across files into the project - as when setting-up the test project; the SBT functionality were all showing errors and I could not get past them. I will create a repo for the new Play seed with sbt-vuefy and invite you so that you can see. Thanks_
Yes, I've never used projects/Common.scala before. I'm not sure how it works exactly.
But, if you put Assets / VueKeys.vuefy / VueKeys.prodCommands := Set("stage"), in build.sbt directly, does it work?
Initially I did try to build the test-project exactly as it is but didn't have any success. But strangely I have just put the settings into the build and it is thankfully working. The projects/Common.scala file was only in order to reuse the settings as I have a sub-project in the application (https://www.playframework.com/documentation/2.5.x/SBTSubProjects) - so it is only creating a variable for the settings and therefore I'm not sure why this was an issue. Anyway the next challenge is to try get something pre-rendered on the server-side - like this react project. Do you have any ideas on this? Thanks again - it looks tight!