Add RESQML input/output

[untereiner]

created branch for adding RESQML input/output via fesapi.

[untereiner]

Hi! To avoid too many conflicts until this draft will be ready, I suggest to turn this pull request into three ones:

• 1st one: extract vtk logic into new files, mergeable quickly
  • [x] #2116
• 2nd one: correspond to his sister one in the third parties just to add fesapi in the config files, mergeable quickly
  • [x] #2117
• 3rd one: the draft where I work on the RESQML input/output files

What do you think ?

[klevzoff]

To avoid too many conflicts until this draft will be ready, I suggest to turn this pull request into three ones:

• 1st one: extract vtk logic into new files, mergeable quickly
• 2nd one: correspond to his sister one in the third parties just to add fesapi in the config files, mergeable quickly
• 3rd one: the draft where I work on the RESQML input/output files

What do you think ?

Sounds like a good plan :+1:

[TotoGaz]

Hi! To avoid too many conflicts until this draft will be ready, I suggest to turn this pull request into three ones:

• 1st one: extract vtk logic into new files, mergeable quickly
• 2nd one: correspond to his sister one in the third parties just to add fesapi in the config files, mergeable quickly
• 3rd one: the draft where I work on the RESQML input/output files

What do you think ?

We can start like this. It would be interested to get a more precise of what you want to implement first.

Is Gaetan B. going to run a first CR?

[untereiner]

I am going to implement the load of:

• unstructured grids
• regions from RESQML subrepresentations
• cell attributes from RESQML properties

What I do not know yet is how are handled the units of measure and if it exists a field kind catalog in GEOSX.

[untereiner]

Hi @TotoGaz, @klevzoff, @francoishamon. If you have time could you start looking at this PR ? ~~There are two builds failing because they run out of time. I don't know what I can unplug to be under the 3 hours~~ It's a big piece, it will probably take time to be reviewed.

[untereiner]

@TotoGaz I reworked the contribution to simplify it. Would it be possible for you to review it ?

[herve-gross]

@francoishamon @TotoGaz or @klevzoff can you start reviewing this PR? If not, please indicate who else should review it. Thanks!

[TotoGaz]

@francoishamon @TotoGaz or @klevzoff can you start reviewing this PR? If not, please indicate who else should review it. Thanks!

Hello, as I previously discussed, we'd like this PR to be first reviewed by the original project manager. Our bandwidth is really limited.