Fynn Beuttenmüller

Totally! These converter submodules should only need minor updates (with the option to add additional converters). Providing both functionalities as you suggest makes sense to me 👍 Anyone interested in...

@bioimage-io/spec-dev anyone interested in taking a look?

At danger of pointing out the obvious.... with pooch you wouldn't need a dedicated package. You could load the same collection from multiple projects/packages.

> What do you think? not sure if this really provides value. For debugging one can simply add a breakpoint in the for loop of the run_workflow op... Not sure...

You raise some good points I didn't think of yesterday. I'll look into implementing the workflow steps with `yield`... 👍

most content---workflow implementations and workflow exectuion logic--was moved to https://github.com/bioimage-io/workflows-bioimage-io-python the resolved nodes remain.

unfortunately I mixed in the renaming of `ImportedSource` to `ImportedCallable` into this PR and it's counterpart in spec: https://github.com/bioimage-io/spec-bioimage-io/pull/478 It's just some renaming to avoid confusion about source as in...

together with new repo https://github.com/bioimage-io/workflows-bioimage-io-python this updated PR supersedes #312 and #316

currently, the default cache folder is still defined in bioimageio.spec. There are also use cases for a cache there, so I opened a new issue to discuss cache solutions there:...

Awesome overview of the pre- and postprocessing in use! This makes it clear that we can go a long way with a few standardized pre-/postprocessing operations! > First, about having...