Jasper Behrensdorf

I think it might be this one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465510002973?casa_token=h6XtX6Xec3kAAAAA:KWqPGO99VBkyciXm7i508Z8E6snyxEFfgmFLApnmwA8cDPZ3EZFoEpcCLr8k8bBElePcGCvNEPo

The above mentioned paper is for the upper bound of the total indices. The local indices are averaged in standard normal space and computed using this method: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nme.2687

Response Surface added in #87

The empirical distribution tests fails when comparing the `pdf` values. Maybe we could just test that the empirical pdf integrates to 1 and is positive everywhere.

I checked and since there are sufficient tests in QMC.jl I think we can be very brief here and just check that under randomization the samples returned are different evry...

@mlsuh Can you include this in #143 ?

I think we should implement proper types to dispatch on instead of dispatching on the `inputs` vector like - `DoubleLoop(MonteCarlo(10000))` - `IntervalMonteCarlo(1000)` Each method should than check, that at least...

On that note, we might also define the input types with the proper terminology: - `DeterministicUQInput` - `AleatoryUQInput` - `EpistemicUQInput` - `HybridUQInput` Is this too complex? The user will usually...

> On that note, we might also define the input types with the proper terminology: > > * `DeterministicUQInput` > > * `AleatoryUQInput` > > * `EpistemicUQInput` > > *...

> > On that note, we might also define the input types with the proper terminology: > > ``` > > * `DeterministicUQInput` > > > > * `AleatoryUQInput` >...