Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen

> It is hard to tell if the selected works are true duplicates. […] I cannot easily tell if there are works with the same title but a different author....

@DipeshK47 It’s still open, but there’s an open PR for it by the currently assigned person.

> This is essentially the same as "squashing" (at least visually) edits or commits How so? I’m envisioning a list of edits/revisions, similar to "Recent Activity" on profile pages: [![screenshot...

Here is a use case: https://openlibrary.org/authors/OL2801165A/Philip_Jones – there is one edit associated with this author, which is its creation. Note that it was created on “April 29, 2008”. The [oldest...

Being super librarian now and reviewing other people’s merges and coming across Author merge candidates with 100’s of Works associated with them, it gets pretty much impossible to figure out...

> The first works got created in Q4 2009 When I wrote that comment yesterday, I was looking at entities created in the 2010’s and 2020’s. Also, I get that...

> It would be helpful if, when a work or author is created, that the original source is noted and unmodifiable so that there is always a single source of...

Yes, please make it possible to reverse direction on all the order options. Looking for oldest receipts/proofs is cumbersome, having to scroll down and down and down and down and...

FW(little)IW: > Always showing the Wikidata short description too. I’d be in favour of this. The more information provided at merge time, the better. :) This might be better for...

https://github.com/protegeproject/protege/issues/822 should maybe be closed in favour of this, then. (Or maybe just closed, if you’re already working off of 11.)