imx-secure-enclave: Update to lf-6.12.3-1.0.0

[mdrodrigo]

[mdrodrigo]

Hi, @thochstein

@otavio and I think it's best to combine the different recipes in the meta-imx layer into a single one, for better organization.

Can you check if everything is ok?

[otavio]

Ok, I understand what you are explaining, that you have two different builds, but does it make sense to have it build twice? Could you provide more information about why do we need to have both builds and why this is specific of this SOC type?

[thochstein]

I don't understand the details, but what I do understand is that they requested both PLAT flavors to be installed for certain SOCs. Building both PLAT flavors in a single recipe seems a good idea. To verify the results, please check that the packages created with the combined recipe do accurately contain the full union of the packages created with the separate recipes.

[otavio]

Okay, but I think that we need more details to understand why this needs to be done. You know that sometimes they envision some fancy architecture for the recipes that are not required, or it's just a misunderstanding between what needs to be done and the proper way of doing that. So could you inquire that internally to understand why this needs to be done that way? And then we see how we can try to support that properly.

[thochstein]

I think this answers your question: https://github.com/nxp-imx/imx-secure-enclave/blob/lf-6.12.3_1.0.0/README

[angolini]

is this PR still relevant?

[thochstein]

I think it's relevant, but unfinished. The commit did an update and a rework, but the rework looks to have problems as I pointed out.