FreeRTOS-Kernel
FreeRTOS-Kernel copied to clipboard
Introduce configTRACK_TASK_MEMORY_ALLOCATIONS to track dynamic allocations per task
Description
Introduce configTRACK_TASK_MEMORY_ALLOCATIONS. When this is set to 1 and either heap_4 or heap_5 is used then the number of dynamic memory allocations, the number of dynamic memory frees, the total amount of heap memory allocated by a task but not yet freed (by any task), and the maximum amount of heap memory a task has ever had allocated at one time are all tracked on a task by task basis. This additional information is returned in the TaskStatus_t structure populated by the vTaskGetInfo() and the uxTaskGetSystemState() API functions.
uxBasePriority is now only included in the TaskStatus_t structure if configUSE_MUTEXES is set to 1. ulRunTimeCounter is now only included in the TaskStatus_t structure if configGENERATE_RUN_TIME_STATS is set to 1.
Update how the TCB members get initialised. Previously each member was initialised separately. Now, as there are new members, memset() the entire structure to 0 when the structure is allocated, then only explicitly initialise structure members that are not initialised to zero.
Test Steps
Add prvExerciseTaskHeapAllocationStats() to the MSVC Win32 and MPS2 QEMU IAR demos - upstreamed to the FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS repo in a separate PR.
Related Issue
The PR that adds prvExerciseTaskHeapAllocationStats() to the FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS repo.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
8e2dd5b
) 92.15% compared to head (2d6724e
) 92.15%. Report is 350 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #353 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.15% 92.15%
=======================================
Files 4 4
Lines 1274 1274
Branches 343 343
=======================================
Hits 1174 1174
Misses 53 53
Partials 47 47
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 92.15% <ø> (ø) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Spell check is failing because of variable names. Is spell check meant to check the C code, or just the comments?
Hi @RichardBarry I just checked with team. It looks like the current spell checker checks any line of code with comment. So if a C code line contains a comment it will check the spell of entire line inclduing the code itself. We are look for some more generic spell checker to replace the current one and hopfully can resolve the problem.
But I'm going to unblock this PR by adding exclusion of those words for now.
/bot run checks
I think this work has been done at this point? It looks like we have traceMALLOC and traceFREE calls inside of the heap files now Should this PR be closed?
Quality Gate failed
Failed conditions
D Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)
B Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)
See analysis details on SonarCloud
Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension
SonarLint