Franz Busch

Ah that's an unfortunate unambiguity but the proposed change here would be breaking API. In hindsight we should have made the parameter `serviceConfigurations` and `services` for the other one. What...

Thanks for opening this @MaxDesiatov. This is something we can look into after the 1.0 release!

We should apply the same to zip, debounce and co

This looks good from my side. The CI failure is due to a broken nightly toolchain. @phausler If you are happy please merge it.

Are you still seeing this issue?

This PR should fix it: https://github.com/apple/swift-async-algorithms/pull/254

@buttaface Thanks for raising. This these tests are problematic because they are using test expectations which just don't work nicely in async methods. We should refactor these tests to become...

Right now this is intentional. We might want to revisit this on a larger scale if we do it and make all `init`s public. cc @phausler

Thanks for opening this @adam-fowler! Definitely a needed `AsyncSequence`. We are still finalising the 1.0.0 release. I will mark this as a 1.1.0 candidate

The problem you are running into here is that we don't generate empty files when there are no service definitions in the `proto` file. We could certainly add an option...