Franz Busch
Franz Busch
Amazing investigation @etcwilde! Thanks for doing this. I agree with your sentiment that we should be doing this for all Linux platforms to make sure we are not picking up...
We definitely need to line up the installed dependencies for the toolchains here with the installed dependencies in the docker images then. @shahmishal can we come up with a way...
@etcwilde pointed out that we need to install newer gcc versions for some toolchain builds. We also need these to be installed in the respective docker images right? We should...
Just saw everything works except CentOS7 and UBI9. Need to check why UBI9 failed
+1 from me on this. I would love to enable this experimental feature on all our Swift on Server libraries to avoid regressing here.
Can we make it an experimental feature then? Just making opt-in easier would go a long way even if it is only used in CI builds.
I think this has been fixed by some change. Let's close it for now.
This is an important topic to cover and something that we are currently discussing in the broader ecosystem. [The SSWG is currently gathering requirements for a general purpose HTTP server](https://forums.swift.org/t/requirements-for-a-high-level-http-server-type/65337)....
I agree with @Lukasa here. These types should be the raw representation of the specs and provide a common set of types that we can share across the various frameworks...
cc @yim-lee can you help us here. The performance tests seem to broken.