fdb-kubernetes-operator
fdb-kubernetes-operator copied to clipboard
FoundationDB
A kubernetes operator for FoundationDB
### What happened? if using ``` routing: publicIPSource: service ``` after svc got deleted, it will be recreated like: ``` oc get svc NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE mdm-foundationdb-ibm-log-1...
### What would you like to be added/changed? We can change the number of storage server per pod with the storageServersPerPod setting. This allows more efficient use of IOPS, since...
# Description Fixes: https://github.com/FoundationDB/fdb-kubernetes-operator/issues/1316 ## Type of change - New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Discussion - ## Testing - ## Documentation - ## Follow-up I will write...
# Description *Please include a summary of the change and which issue is addressed. If this change resolves an issue, please include the issue number in the description.* ## Type...
### What happened? We have an e2e pipeline currently that tests how long it takes to rollout a knob. In this test case we noticed that a coordinator change will...
### What would you like to be added/changed? The current automatic replacement implementation has the limitation that it only works on a per process group level. That means that the...
# Description This PR adds "test" processCount. ## Type of change - Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Discussion This changes are based on discussion under https://github.com/FoundationDB/fdb-kubernetes-operator/issues/1346...
### What would you like to be added/changed? We should make use of the controller-runtime fake client in our mock client implementation. See: https://pkg.go.dev/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/client/fake it seems like the fake client...
### What happened? Applying foundationdbcluster with: ` processCounts: tester: 4 ` result in unhealthy tester nodes in foundationdb cluster. ### What did you expect to happen? Have test processes in...
### What would you like to be added/changed? We could hit some corner cases by just looking at the process uptime. To make the check more robust we should check...