Add shared element transitions
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/336449371
Wow, seems both SET within navigations and downloadScreen grid/list switch works perfectly!
Btw, my telegram account gone again, and maybe I won't register a new one in a long time.
Is there anything blocking we land this?
Is there anything blocking we land this?
Haven't got time to look at this
Everything looks good, seems we don't need https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/336449371?
Everything looks good, seems we don't need https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/336449371?
Yeah, could you help test if that snippet still behaves incorrectly?
Everything looks good, seems we don't need https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/336449371?
Yeah, could you help test if that snippet still behaves incorrectly?
Yes, the issue persists.
Everything looks good, seems we don't need https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/336449371?
Yeah, could you help test if that snippet still behaves incorrectly?
Yes, the issue persists.
Acked.
@revonateB0T I think we may only want shared element transitions for list <=> detail. The list <=> list and list <=> grid transitions feel distracting as there are too many moving parts. Like the M3 guide says https://m3.material.io/styles/motion/transitions/applying-transitions#b974d94c-bf80-4c54-8818-4a1d7eaa10ae
@revonateB0T I think we may only want shared element transitions for list <=> detail. The list <=> list and list <=> grid transitions feel distracting as there are too many moving parts. Like the M3 guide says https://m3.material.io/styles/motion/transitions/applying-transitions#b974d94c-bf80-4c54-8818-4a1d7eaa10ae
Well, maybe, list <=> grid is somewhat lag as there's so many moving items. But I suppose the multiple SET framework can be kept in case it's useful and we may need it one day.