FlyTOmeLight

Results 20 comments of FlyTOmeLight
trafficstars

> * why do you configure proxy-rewrite to change uri? It's confusing and completely unnecessary for grpc. > * we has lots of same modelserver endpoint need to proxy, they...

> ```json > ingress > ``` but i actually use grpc scheme @kingluo ``` {{- if .Values.ingress.enabled -}} apiVersion: apisix.apache.org/v2 kind: ApisixRoute metadata: name: {{ .Release.Name }} spec: http: -...

> You should split the ApisixUpstream into multiple upstream specs, one for grpc. i follow by this example and set the apisixupstream spec, you mean i should split it into...

> What's your APISIX Ingress version? > > You can just use admin API to check the results @tao12345666333

> > ```json > > ingress > > ``` > > but i actually use grpc scheme @kingluo > > ``` > {{- if .Values.ingress.enabled -}} > apiVersion: apisix.apache.org/v2 >...

@tao12345666333 @kingluo Hi, Is there any update?

> @FlyTOmeLight Could you confirm this route matched the wrong upstream scheme? I actually set grpc scheme, i give all the config and description in this issue, could you please...

> I mean, the name of this route contains "grpc", but it points to "http" upstream, is it expected or not? > > ![1681209860508](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4401042/231137606-78e0b6fd-058e-402c-a7ac-7b44d0615e12.png) > > ![1681209888968](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4401042/231137630-bb5c99bf-2680-410d-951e-0c77f7b823ea.png) > > If...

I conducted a lot of experiments and found that in apisixupstream, multiple schemes cannot be set. It always takes the scheme of the last element in the "portlevelsetting" array. I'm...

> We are building a new IC which will resolve this issue. if there update with this bug?