Firstyear

> So there's at least something out in the wild taking an opinionated stance on what information out of an attestation is/might be useful for future-proofing an RP as utilization...

At this point should I put forward draft wording for review?

Yes I think so :)

@aseigler It looks like your TPM is providing Alg::NULL which is invalid. As a result, it's not actually parseable. Specifically this is in the Tpmt structure from 12.2.4 TPMT_PUBLIC TPM-Rev2.0...

Thanks @aseigler! I'm sitting down to look at this now :)

This a good analysis, I agree with this :)

This is desperately needed as currently to implement webauthn on the server side, you also need to create a matching client JS library. So long as it's consider how this...

> > So long as it's consider how this will work in a WASM context for non-js languages, then this is supported by me. > > Architecturally, 90+% of browser-hosted...

> > As the author of Webauthn-RS, who implemented the demo site and examples for all client side browser elements in WASM and NOT Javascript, I'd like to disagree. There...

> > What is there that needs elaborating? Instead of using JS, you use WASM. As a result, and changes to make it easier to get from JSON -> navigator.credentials.get/create...