responsive_builder
responsive_builder copied to clipboard
Added more fine tuned controls for different devices
More sizes added. Example file also updated to integrate with the new additions. Readme.md not edited.
There are some breaking changes here so I'll move some of the code over and refactor and tag this PR in it.
Okay. So what do I do now? Close the PR? (Sorry but i'm new to contributing.)
@razein97 I keep it open to remind myself I still have to do it. Basically the solution I have in mind should keep the current setup in terms of being able to supply mobile, tablet and desktop at a high level. Similarly to the additional OrientationLayoutBuilder which you can then use to provide your orientation layouts I'm imagining an additional widget builder like RefinedLayoutBuilder
.
This should allow you to get much more control as well if you look at it like this.
ScreenTypeLayout.builder(
mobile: (context) => RefinedLayoutBuilder(
small: HomeMobileSmall(),
normal: HomeMobileNormal(),
large: HomeMobileLarge(),
extraLarge: HomeMobileExtraLarge()
)
This will make it so that you can use the RefinedLayoutBuilder
on it's own if say for instance you're only working on Mobile but you still want to show different layouts for different screen sizes. It will require an additional Enum specifically for small, normal, large, extraLarge as well as a function similar to getValueForScreenType
which will allow you to return different values based on the Refined size. This means you can also return specific values per platform and refined size if you nest the calls.
getValueForScreenType<double>(
context: context,
mobile: getValueForRefinedSize<double>(
context: context,
small: 10,
normal: 15,
large: 30,
),
);
Hopefully I can get to it today. I'm not making a video this week so I'll be finishing up some things that's been lingering.
Any update on this?
@TutOsirisOm Not at the moment. My comment above described the implementation i will make if I have time, OP or you can implement that and make a PR?
@FilledStacks I'll see what I can do!
@FilledStacks How's this look? #19