FilipJanitor

It surely is possible to implement, I am thinking more about the implications of such experimental syntax - one of them might be user confusion. Because if there are more...

I think 2 and 3 are perfectly reasonable, the only thing I am not sure is the semantics of 3. The second number is a step or a next number...

I am not sure if i understand correctly, but would not such shift alter the semantics?

Well, when nesting methods or classes I would expect the scope to change compared to top level ones.

And how about the nested methods/assignments accessing some objects from outer scope? Probably some kind of lexical scoping is necessary for this.

Again - I apologize if I am talking about something different from what you mean by this issue. As for the example, [here](http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~fischer/cs536.s06/course.hold/html/NOTES/8.RUNTIME-VAR-ACCESS.html#static) is a material I used when learning...

Python solves the last problem with standard library [textwrap.dedent](https://docs.python.org/2/library/textwrap.html#textwrap.dedent)

Haskell does it even nicer. It makes the user to decide where the leading indentation ends and the actual string value starts https://stackoverflow.com/a/22919011

Bump! Do we have any ideas or preferences about this? I kind of like the very first example as we can simply add a rule - adjacent string literals are...

I was not aware of the linefold functionality, If it is possible to avoid some indentation ambiguity that way, that would be great. Regarding your example, well, I still dont...