FanDjango comments

Results 406 comments of


                                            FanDjango

Is it possible to delete all files from a directory in one command? (empty a directory)

Many clients have an "MDEL", "MPUT" and "MGET" client command (with or without prompting) and they internally do the needed `GetListing` and globbing to allow such operations as ``` MDEL...

Is it possible to delete all files from a directory in one command? (empty a directory)

Ok, I did some more research. Some servers have actually got specialized RMDIR commands, like for example proftpd. And these are known to FluentFTP - Here is the current list...

Is it possible to delete all files from a directory in one command? (empty a directory)

..which I have done. There is PR out there now and once it is merged, you can do this: New function entirely: `EmptyDirectory(...)` i.e. "make a directory become empty". Using...

Is it possible to delete all files from a directory in one command? (empty a directory)

@wertzui See the above amended usage for `EmptyDirectory(...)`. It has been merged and you could use it from now by getting the master branch down from GitHub. Since some other...

Timeout exception in GetObjectInfo when path contains "[" or "]"

See #101 Should work in current versions of FluentFTP. See also Wiki [path problems](https://github.com/robinrodricks/FluentFTP/wiki/Troubleshooting#trouble_paths)

issue with Active Mode, cannot reuse the ActivePorts, then throw exception

I have reproduced this and can confirm this behaviour. It seems that the sockets in the selection loop are not being selected because they are still in a listening state,...

issue with Active Mode, cannot reuse the ActivePorts, then throw exception

Looks to me like on a Listen - Accept sequence, the bound listening socket is overwritten by the acceptance socket, thereby "leaving it hanging", still listening. Subsequent close/dispose actions will...

issue with Active Mode, cannot reuse the ActivePorts, then throw exception

I have put up a PR #957 that fixes this - perhaps @DoraemonYu you can find some way to test this, before it is released by @robinrodricks for everyone?

issue with Active Mode, cannot reuse the ActivePorts, then throw exception

Thanks once again for the excellent diagnosis. I found the place: `private void CheckResult(SocketAsyncEventArgs args) {...}` Added the needed `.Close()` and tested it with .NET 6. Once it is merged,...

issue with Active Mode, cannot reuse the ActivePorts, then throw exception

It is merged.