Famlam

> Because it is really important to allow distinction with other substations with higher voltage. Hmm, I would still be in favor of not proposing a value if it's unknown....

A ford can also be through wet (or intermittent wet) landuses, I think.

Thank you for your report! I think the report of Osmose is generally following the wiki though. The [amenity](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub) refers to the actual pub. On the other hand, the [landuse](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dretail)...

I was primarily thinking about cases like these: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169576296 Usually such cases are a compromise between keeping the historic railway information ("the highway follows the trace of a former railway")...

First one is from https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/plugins/Bicycle.validator.mapcss#L49 This has a lot of overlap with https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/resources/data/validator/combinations.mapcss#L996 This we should fix in Osmose. I suspect adding `[highway]` will do the trick: JOSM catches all...

Thanks! When they update their rules, we'll synchronize it into Osmose. Meanwhile I made a PR for the issue in Osmose P.s. offtopic, but regarding the formatting you mention there:...

@didier2020 It's from https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/dev/analysers/analyser_merge_milestone_FR_metropole.py Maybe you remember what is meant here?

I checked the file [central.osm.pbf](http://download.openstreetmap.fr/extracts/north-america/us-south/texas/) using `osmconvert64.exe central.osm.pbf -b=-97.71,30.432,-97.70,30.444 --drop-nodes --drop-relations --drop-author --out-osm > central.osm` It contains: ``` ``` and ``` ``` Which seems to be the most recent data....

I think this can better be proposed to JOSM to include in their mapcss rules. (We import such rules). They already have a big list of such rules, see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/resources/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss#L23

> the check "Untagged named object" ([2110](https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=2110)) highlights objects which are (correctly) tagged with "roller_coaster=track" as being "untagged". This should be fixed. I'm not sure.. is the track itself named...