Famlam
Famlam
It's a very strange tag... 🤔 Whether a ref is a ref or an unsigned_ref, seems to be determined by the frequency and size of the marker, not by whether...
I could argue for such cases, but the wiki is very clear that it also includes roads with signs that are just small. And the examples are pretty - in...
Strangely enough I cannot reproduce this issue on osm110... 🤔
@jocelynj as it's impossible to reproduce on osm110, and it only involves 2 cases, shall I just mark them as false positives? Or do you want to try debugging it...
If it's a one-to-one conversion, then this could also easily be added to the French mapcss rules I think? (But I'm not familiar with this, it's just a thought)
@Jean-BaptisteC Is the following rule what you're looking for to have as a warning? ```css node[power=substation][operator="EDF"][inside("FR")], area[power=substation][operator="EDF"][inside("FR")] { throwWarning: tr("{0} together with {1}", "{0.tag}", "{1.tag}") } ``` To test: 1....
Ah ok, I misunderstood your first post to be about substations of both EDF and ERDF. (I'm not from France) For ERDF there is only 1 entry left, added 4...
How can a oneway have no exit?
@frodrigo Although I see your point, I fear "just" excluding `access=no` would also whitelist for example any busway tagged explicitly with `access=no + bus=yes` or so, and thus prevent errors...
If I run it locally with just that specific way inverted, I get a warning for node 5940032389, way 629125252 Not sure if there's an easy way to run it...