Fernando Correa de Oliveira
Fernando Correa de Oliveira
> `sub foo( @a[Int,Str] ) { dd @a; }; foo [1, "A"]` If you add a space between the `@a` and the `[...]`, you kinda get what you want (if...
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/pull/1029
I don't remember either (if I ever understood)
On the other issue I suggested -E
https://colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/raku?date=2019-10-21#l103
Yes, Iterables... Sorry, what do you mean with “choose to define it on items”? Sent with GitHawk
I think `42` would be more useful... but I’m not sure... Sent with GitHawk
It would behave as a `given` that returns the unchanged value... Sent with GitHawk
Writing Red I found an example that could be using `.do` on scalar: ```perl6 method begin { my $trans = self.new-connection; $trans.prepare(Red::AST::BeginTransaction.new).map: *.execute; $trans } ``` could be just ```perl6...
> I think you shouldn't use `.wrap` for that, but `.assuming`: But assuming will not work the way I need... assuming will not "replace" the sub... I need it to...