check metadata consistency, example: https://fairplus.github.io/the-fair-cookbook/content/recipes/findability/checksum-create.html

[nsjuty]

• [ x] incorporate reviewer's comments

I was viewing source for a recipe recently, and noticed that we actually have 2 identifiers for each recipe, which I am not sure are inter-related in the metadata. I think that would be a good thing to do for all recipes. I may miss the nuisance in the metadata, but it would be good to check. for: https://fairplus.github.io/the-fair-cookbook/content/recipes/findability/checksum-create.html I see also this in the metadata: "@type": "PropertyValue", "name": "FCB052", "url": "https://w3id.org/faircookbook/FCB052"}

but I don't see where they are stated a equivalent....

cheers

Nick

[robertgiessmann]

hi @nsjuty , not sure whether I really got this...

What are the two identifiers? "FCB052" and "https://w3id.org/faircookbook/FCB052"?

[nsjuty]

hiya - I think it would be: https://fairplus.github.io/the-fair-cookbook/content/recipes/findability/checksum-create.html sorry that wasn't clear... I can well imagine people sharing both, and some may think they are different...

[robertgiessmann]

I see. Yeah, no, the intended identifier is https://w3id.org/faircookbook/FCB052 -- we tried to make this clear with "Cite me with...".

Would "permalink" give you more feeling of having an identifier in front of you? Also, we use the shortcut "FCB052" which does not really help. Given identifier.org having registered "fcb", we can also make it [fcb:FCB052] and link to https://identifiers.org/fcb/FCB052 ...

Now we surely need some linked data saying that all of this is the same... ... 🙈

[nsjuty]

exactly! i think all that will help once clearly expressed ;)