Policy_Action_Drop - additional events
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...] The Policy_Action_Drop does not have all the events available to it compared to the manual configuration in the GUI.
Relevant AS3 configuration:
{
"class": "AS3",
"action": "deploy",
"persist": true,
"declaration": {
"class": "ADC",
"schemaVersion": "3.50.2",
"id": "id",
"label": "WebApp",
"OPENSHIFT": {
"class": "Tenant",
"Shared": {
"class": "Application",
"template":"shared"
},
"PREPROD": {
"class": "Application",
"api-int.ocpq1_vs": {
"class": "Service_TCP",
"label": "****",
"persistenceMethods": [],
"policyEndpoint": "api-int.ocpq1_Policy",
"pool": "api-int.ocpq1_http_pool",
"profileTCP": {"egress": {"bigip": "/Common/f5-tcp-lan"}, "ingress": {"bigip": "/Common/f5-tcp-wan"}},
"remark": "***",
"snat": "auto",
"virtualAddresses": ["***"],
"virtualPort": ****
},
"api-int.ocpq1_http_pool": {
"class": "Pool",
"label": "Pool for api-int.ocpq1_vs",
"members": [{"hostname": "***", "servicePort": ***, "addressDiscovery": "fqdn", "autoPopulate": true}, {"hostname": "***", "servicePort": ****, "addressDiscovery": "fqdn", "autoPopulate": true}, {"hostname": "***", "servicePort": ****, "addressDiscovery": "fqdn", "autoPopulate": true}, {"hostname": "***", "servicePort": ***, "addressDiscovery": "fqdn", "autoPopulate": true}],
"monitors": [{"bigip": "/Common/tcp_half_open"}],
"remark": "Pool for api-int.ocpq1_vs"
},
"api-int.ocpq1_allowList": {
"class": "Data_Group",
"keyDataType": "ip",
"label": "Allow list for...",
"storageType": "internal",
"records": [{"key": "****"}, {"key": "****"}]
},
"api-int.ocpq1_Policy": {
"class": "Endpoint_Policy",
"label": "Routing policy for...",
"remark": "Routing policy for...",
"rules": [{"name": "OpenshiftAllow", "remark": "Restrict access to api-int.ocpq1.stholdco.com", "actions": [{"type": "drop", "event": "client-accepted"}], "conditions": [{"type": "tcp", "event": "client-accepted", "address": {"operand": "does-not-match", "datagroup": {"use": "api-int.ocpq1_allowList"}}}]}],
"strategy": "all-match"
}
}
}
}
}
Error: fatal: [f5-viprion-regn10-4c-infra-qa.stholdco.com]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "msg": "{'code': 422, 'errors': ['/OPENSHIFT/PREPROD/api-int.ocpq1_Policy/rules/0/actions/0/event: should be equal to one of the allowed values ["proxy-request","request","ssl-client-hello"]'], 'declarationFullId': '', 'message': 'declaration is invalid', 'declarationId': 'id'}"}
I am attempting to build a SERVICE_TCP virtual server that uses an Endpoint_Policy. The virtual server does not have an HTTP profile applied to it. Because "client-accepted" is not a valid event, I cannot use AS3 to manage it.
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. It would be Great if all the options in the GUI were available to the AS3 creation.
This includes: client accepted http proxy connect http proxy request http proxy response request response server connected etc.
Describe alternatives you've considered
There is no alternative. I cannot build the configuration via AS3 it the way it is built unless "client-accepted" is an accepted event.
Also interested with that feature for Service_TCP type virtual
We need this feature as well to create an ACL function on an SSL Passthrough virtual server.
@RicharddeJong @ppieprzycki @kingb33 please reach out to me to prioritize this feature for a upcoming sprint. Email to [email protected] - If i can all three names we can add to the next sprint!
Also interested in using the "drop" action with "client-accepted" event. Needing this to be able to migrate an existent NetScaler config to AS3.
Add “client-accepted” value to "Policy_Action_Drop" object is in the current sprint and will be part the AS3 52 release posted in July.
AS3 3.52.0 build 2 is now available which adds support for “client-accepted” value under "Policy_Action_Drop". Reach out if you want to todo some early testing.
AS3 3.52.0 build 2 is now available which adds support for “client-accepted” value under "Policy_Action_Drop". Reach out if you want to todo some early testing.
I wouldn't mind trying it out. I don't see 3.52.0 available yet.