fix search invoice page doesn't display merchant text "expense"

[NJ-2020]

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/50794 PROPOSAL: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/50794#issuecomment-2413795409

Tests

Same as QA

• [X] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA

QA Steps

1. Tap FAB > send invoice
2. Create an invoice
3. Go to search page
4. Navigate to invoice section
5. Click the invoice > edit merchant details to "Expense"
6. Go back > refresh the search page (invoice section)
7. Make sure the transaction list item row display merchant text as "Expense"

• [X] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• [X] I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• [X] I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • [X] I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • [X] I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • [X] I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • [X] I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • [X] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • [X] I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• [X] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• [X] I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • [X] Android: Native
  • [X] Android: mWeb Chrome
  • [X] iOS: Native
  • [X] iOS: mWeb Safari
  • [X] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • [X] MacOS: Desktop
• [X] I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• [X] I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • [X] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • [X] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • [X] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • [X] I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • [X] If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • [X] I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • [X] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • [X] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • [X] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• [X] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• [X] I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• [X] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• [X] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• [X] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• [X] I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• [X] If any new file was added I verified that:
  • [X] The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• [X] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • [X] A similar style doesn't already exist
  • [X] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• [X] If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• [X] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• [X] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• [X] If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• [X] If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • [X] I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • [X] I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• [X] If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• [X] I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• [X] If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/006c0da3-1683-4b4c-a945-144e91b260ba

Android: mWeb Chrome

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f43483d3-475b-4674-a5db-f434d6638315

iOS: Native

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ddd15a44-1933-4688-9b14-0613fded62df

iOS: mWeb Safari

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6a8f1e1f-caee-4104-a207-e1611c5be49d

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e09c5ab9-4e8a-4aa4-aba0-aebef696ff10

MacOS: Desktop

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/85998523-fbab-447e-81f4-6536fe366131

[melvin-bot[bot]]

@ishpaul777 @MonilBhavsar One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[ishpaul777]

Reviewer Checklist

• [x] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• [x] I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• [x] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • [x] I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • [x] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • [x] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• [x] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• [x] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • [x] Android: Native
  • [x] Android: mWeb Chrome
  • [x] iOS: Native
  • [x] iOS: mWeb Safari
  • [x] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • [x] MacOS: Desktop
• [x] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• [x] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  • [x] I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• [x] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• [x] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
  • [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • [x] The file is named correctly
  • [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • [x] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• [x] If any new file was added I verified that:
  • [x] The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
  • [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
• [x] If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• [x] If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• [x] If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • [x] I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • [x] I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• [x] If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• [x] For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
• [x] If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/58c5f86f-49e8-43f2-9c35-9c5ae48d09e1

Android: mWeb Chrome

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae62fa39-560c-47e5-85f5-3879e08075e1

iOS: Native

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22062e29-38c6-4efd-acba-b54d850e8ba1

iOS: mWeb Safari

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/733b746f-741b-4403-8c97-214f0f35b2e7

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ead506d4-1568-43e3-8933-5106d034d728

MacOS: Desktop

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b83072a0-fd65-42b6-9e02-59141962f692

[ishpaul777]

@NJ-2020 Can you please add unit tests? https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1733148961659549

[NJ-2020]

@ishpaul777 I think we should include unit tests in new issues(new proposal template) in the proposal based on this

[MonilBhavsar]

Yes, would be good to add unit tests

[luacmartins]

I agree. Let's add some tests.

[NJ-2020]

Creating unit test

Is there any utils function to generate fake search data results?

cc: @luacmartins

[luacmartins]

@NJ-2020 not yet, but you could probably copy/paste a result you get locally.

[NJ-2020]

Hi, I am very sorry. I am OOO now for few days. i am currently mourning my father who has passed away yesterday.

Thanks

cc: @ishpaul777

[MonilBhavsar]

Sorry to hear that. Sending condolences. Please take your time.

[luacmartins]

So sorry to hear that @NJ-2020. Take your time.

[ishpaul777]

I am so sorry to hear about your loss. Please accept my deepest condolences to you and your family during this difficult time. Take all the time you need @NJ-2020

[NJ-2020]

Sorry for the delay

Done, I've created the unit test file

Please re-review

cc: @ishpaul777 @luacmartins

---

Also I see another bug while creating the unit test file, the OnyxTypes.SearchResults typescript type shows some errors if we copy paste directly the result from BE, because the result data from the BE is not matching with the typescript type like some property does not exist in the typescript type and other

[ishpaul777]

@NJ-2020 Please fix eslint check failing, should be straightforward

[NJ-2020]

Done

cc: @MonilBhavsar

[NJ-2020]

Ohh sorry of my lack comments, Done

cc: @MonilBhavsar

[OSBotify]

:hand: This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[github-actions[bot]]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MonilBhavsar in version: 9.0.80-1 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	success ✅

[github-actions[bot]]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.0.80-6 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄	failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄	success ✅