[Workspace Feeds] Card name field missing on confirmation page

[m-natarajan]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: Reproducible in staging?: Reproducible in production?: If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?: If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by: Slack conversation (hyperlinked to channel name):

Action Performed:

Prerequisite: Members and company cards added in workspace

1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
2. Choose the workspace from settings
3. Initiate the "assign card" flow
4. Observe the confirmation page

Expected Result:

Card name field should appear on confirmation page

Actual Result:

Card name field missing on confirmation page

Workaround:

unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• [ ] Android: Standalone
• [ ] Android: HybridApp
• [ ] Android: mWeb Chrome
• [ ] iOS: Standalone
• [ ] iOS: HybridApp
• [ ] iOS: mWeb Safari
• [x] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• [ ] MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence


View all open jobs on GitHub

[melvin-bot[bot]]

Triggered auto assignment to @VictoriaExpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot[bot]]

Triggered auto assignment to @luacmartins (AutoAssignerNewDotQuality)

[MelvinBot]

This has been labelled "Needs Reproduction". Follow the steps here: https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/16989

[m-natarajan]

BZ team member, Callstack will work on this issue, please wait for them to comment before moving the issue forward.

[mountiny]

Handling this as part of the project I have worked on

[VickyStash]

Hi, I'm Viktoryia from Callstack - expert contributor group - and I would like to work on this issue.

[mountiny]

Currently the assign card command does jot allow to use custom name, we will need to update it as such

[VickyStash]

Updates: I've prepared FE Draft PR. I just need to test it over BE updates when they are ready and add screenshots/recordings.

[VickyStash]

The PR is ready for the review!

[melvin-bot[bot]]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot[bot]]

The solution for this issue has been :rocket: deployed to production :rocket: in version 9.0.59-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period :calendar:. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/52028

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-11-18. :confetti_ball:

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @VickyStash does not require payment (Contractor)
• @allgandalf requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)

[melvin-bot[bot]]

@allgandalf @VictoriaExpensify The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed. Please copy/paste the BugZero Checklist from here into a new comment on this GH and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[allgandalf]

BugZero Checklist:

• [x] [Contributor] Classify the bug:

Bug classification

Source of bug:

• [ ] 1a. Result of the original design (eg. a case wasn't considered)
• [x] 1b. Mistake during implementation
• [ ] 1c. Backend bug
• [ ] 1z. Other:

Where bug was reported:

• [ ] 2a. Reported on production
• [ ] 2b. Reported on staging (deploy blocker)
• [x] 2c. Reported on both staging and production
• [ ] 2d. Reported on a PR
• [ ] 2z. Other:

Who reported the bug:

• [ ] 3a. Expensify user
• [x] 3b. Expensify employee
• [ ] 3c. Contributor
• [ ] 3d. QA
• [ ] 3z. Other:

• [x] [Contributor] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

  Link to comment: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/48278/files#r1848339265

• [x] [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

  Link to discussion: N/A

No regression test required here. (Will be added at the end of the project)

• [ ] [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

Regression Test Proposal Template

• [ ] [BugZero Assignee] Create a GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.

  Link to issue:

Regression Test Proposal

Precondition:

Test:

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

[allgandalf]

@VickyStash was the card name something decided later or part of the design doc that we missed during implementation? Asking for the ^ checklist fields

[VickyStash]

@allgandalf It was a part of the design doc that we missed I guess.

[melvin-bot[bot]]

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

• Contributor: @VickyStash is from an agency-contributor and not due payment
• ROLE: @allgandalf paid $(AMOUNT) via Upwork (LINK)

BugZero Checklist (@VictoriaExpensify)

• [ ] I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
• [ ] I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
• [ ] I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
• [ ] I have verified the payment summary above is correct

[mountiny]

Waiting for the checklist, then we can close this issue as we will handle regression testing with @joekaufmanexpensify and payments for the project altogether

[allgandalf]

Done with checklist, lets close this

[VictoriaExpensify]

@allgandalf it sounds like we should have a regression test for this, can you please add the regression test to the template?

If you disagree, let me know

[allgandalf]

is it? from @mountiny comment here:

we can close this issue as we will handle regression testing with @joekaufmanexpensify and payments for the project altogether

I think the idea here is to add the tests at the end of project. but either ways i have no issue providing a regression test. LMK if i should provide one

[VictoriaExpensify]

Oh hmm so we aren't handling payments here either? Ok, no prob if they are being managed under a different project.