Animate settlement button when pay and trigger a haptic feedback
Details
We want to animate the settlement button when pay and trigger a heavy haptic feedback.
Fixed Issues
$ https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/48036 PROPOSAL: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/48036#issuecomment-2326224712
Tests
Same as QA Steps
- [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
Offline tests
Same as QA Steps
QA Steps
- Open your policy expense chat
- Submit a request. Approve if needed.
- Pay the money request
- Verify the pay button animates (as shown here)
- (Android/iOS) Verify there is a vibrate when pressing the pay button
- [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
PR Author Checklist
- [x] I linked the correct issue in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [x] I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- [x] I added steps for local testing in the
Testssection - [x] I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the
Offline stepssection - [x] I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the
QA stepssection - [x] I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [x] I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
- [x] I added steps for local testing in the
- [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [x] I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- [x] Android: Native
- [x] Android: mWeb Chrome
- [x] iOS: Native
- [x] iOS: mWeb Safari
- [x] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- [x] MacOS: Desktop
- [x] I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
- [x] I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick) - [x] I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method- [x] If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- [x] I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [x] I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [x] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected) - [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [x] I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
- [x] If any new file was added I verified that:
- [x] The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
- [x] If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [x] If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- [x] If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- [x] I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- [x] I added
Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.
- [x] If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - [x] If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.
Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36ef21ff-8adb-4a14-96b1-c79796c65dfe
Android: mWeb Chrome
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e21ef364-d8ed-448c-abac-7337e8d62a04
iOS: Native
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/944aac32-a21a-4ed9-b5dd-83ed36b1d8a1
iOS: mWeb Safari
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/04f48226-ecb5-4780-abd5-308f54d75cd0
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/01e4d8c6-de71-4c14-b3f4-91b339eef949
MacOS: Desktop
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0dc31cd3-efb7-4058-b6ff-cbbb307072c9
@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
@bernhardoj We still have issue with eslint
And I will check PR today
Done
Reviewer Checklist
- [x] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- [x] I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [x] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- [x] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - [x] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - [x] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [x] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- [x] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [x] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- [x] Android: Native
- [x] Android: mWeb Chrome
- [x] iOS: Native
- [x] iOS: mWeb Safari
- [x] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- [x] MacOS: Desktop
- [x] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- [x] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - [x] I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - [x] I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [x] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [x] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - [x] The file is named correctly
- [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - [x] Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- [x] If any new file was added I verified that:
- [x] The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- [x] If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [x] If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- [x] If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- [x] I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- [x] I added
Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.
- [x] If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - [x] If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5dc219da-2d56-4073-8d12-6befddbedc06
Android: mWeb Chrome
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0441d810-cf8a-4cd3-86e7-ab32472be541
iOS: Native
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3a546058-d2ef-49f3-a668-447e7e380281
iOS: mWeb Safari
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/508b927a-db01-4def-8aed-0addbea57b6a
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56d5aedc-9b2f-4d29-a877-183e2d34711f
MacOS: Desktop
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eb5358f2-b5ac-465f-960d-2833c6481761
@bernhardoj I have a crash when I click on the approve button and immediately click pay Could you check please ?
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c6d2723-1ce4-41c0-9a7d-e8892a3183f9
And I have a small visual bug (green line) But I hope this is a simulator problem
Hmm, I can't repro both. Can you share the crash log?
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/deb696e0-fe4a-463e-9b86-25e337c6a477
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d83f6322-ccea-4c61-a114-f3aeb7bbd57d
I will recheck today or tomorrow Maybe these were isolated cases 😅
About second bug No longer reproducing
But about first one
Looks like this crash related with our changes
And following console Issue related with options
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7894303-0e30-4ba9-a38d-668598c0fe8a
When the animation starts options becomes equal [] And when we try to get disabled we have crash
https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/05e48180ab189d1824b080e48c452d44120a48b3/src/components/ButtonWithDropdownMenu/index.tsx#L157
And here
https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/05e48180ab189d1824b080e48c452d44120a48b3/src/components/ButtonWithDropdownMenu/index.tsx#L160
https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/05e48180ab189d1824b080e48c452d44120a48b3/src/components/ButtonWithDropdownMenu/index.tsx#L109
@ZhenjaHorbach one thing I noticed in your video is that the payment option is Pay $xx with Expensify. It will be shown as long as the below condition is satisfied. https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/498d45cc55bae4dde9f85036c75d5a421e0469e9/src/components/SettlementButton.tsx#L168-L170
After paying the request, shouldHidePaymentOptions becomes true, making the options empty. It's true because the report is not payable any more.
https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/498d45cc55bae4dde9f85036c75d5a421e0469e9/src/components/ReportActionItem/ReportPreview.tsx#L309
https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/498d45cc55bae4dde9f85036c75d5a421e0469e9/src/components/ReportActionItem/ReportPreview.tsx#L488
So, I decided to move back to the state to play the animation to ReportPreview so we can keep showing the payment option when the animation is still running.
The root cause is just a guess though because Pay $xx with Expensify requires BA connected, but I was never able to get connected to the BA in staging, so please test if it fixes the issue.
@ZhenjaHorbach one thing I noticed in your video is that the payment option is Pay $xx with Expensify. It will be shown as long as the below condition is satisfied.
https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/498d45cc55bae4dde9f85036c75d5a421e0469e9/src/components/SettlementButton.tsx#L168-L170
After paying the request,
shouldHidePaymentOptionsbecomes true, making the options empty. It's true because the report is not payable any more.https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/498d45cc55bae4dde9f85036c75d5a421e0469e9/src/components/ReportActionItem/ReportPreview.tsx#L309
https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/498d45cc55bae4dde9f85036c75d5a421e0469e9/src/components/ReportActionItem/ReportPreview.tsx#L488
So, I decided to move back to the state to play the animation to ReportPreview so we can keep showing the payment option when the animation is still running.
The root cause is just a guess though because Pay $xx with Expensify requires BA connected, but I was never able to get connected to the BA in staging, so please test if it fixes the issue.
Hmm Yeah That looks like the root cause I'll check the fix today !
And the crash was fixed Thanks !
LGTM !
conflicts
Fixed.
@roryabraham Done
:hand: This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.0.35-0 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | success ✅ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/grgia in version: 9.0.35-7 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | success ✅ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |
FYI, we also applied animation to the settlement button in the money report header (#53474). :D