Fix: Workspace member has option to edit categories
Details
Fixed Issues
$ https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/43623 PROPOSAL: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/43623#issuecomment-2165303496
Tests
Precondition: User should have an workspace with all categories Disabled:
- Go to FAB > Track expense.
- Track a manual expense.
- In self-DM Click Categorize it from the actionable whisper.
- Verify that: the workspace without categories isn't an option
- [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
Offline tests
QA Steps
Same as tests
- [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
PR Author Checklist
- [x] I linked the correct issue in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [x] I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- [x] I added steps for local testing in the
Testssection - [x] I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the
Offline stepssection - [x] I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the
QA stepssection - [x] I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [x] I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
- [x] I added steps for local testing in the
- [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [x] I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- [x] Android: Native
- [x] Android: mWeb Chrome
- [x] iOS: Native
- [x] iOS: mWeb Safari
- [x] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- [x] MacOS: Desktop
- [x] I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
- [x] I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick) - [x] I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method- [x] If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- [x] I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [x] I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [x] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected) - [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [x] I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
- [x] If any new file was added I verified that:
- [x] The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
- [x] If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [x] If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- [x] If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- [x] I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- [x] I added
Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.
- [x] If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - [x] If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.
Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/171708823/c5ac6144-2cee-478f-bc96-7f14e067df4e
Android: mWeb Chrome
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/171708823/315f248e-a3b3-40e8-8fcb-b6981fb7ce9e
iOS: Native
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/171708823/659dfa4f-2397-413d-8263-70b11270925b
iOS: mWeb Safari
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/171708823/0526ca95-81e7-46d5-ba53-fe8b839ea31e
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/171708823/3b724b10-6ba6-4a77-8563-7cb208dcbddd
MacOS: Desktop
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/171708823/26ee2546-00ac-47c7-a046-3c3c2c583d1b
@dannymcclain @allgandalf One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]
[!IMPORTANT]
@daledah, the new expected result from this PR is as follows: not show workspaces that don't have any categories enabled in the list of workspaces when you select Categorize from Concierge's suggested actions
friendly bump @daledah
i'll update today
@allgandalf i updated, please check again with my solution
@daledah can you update the Videos on all platforms, they still seem to be on the old logic
Sorry for delay, I'll update today
@allgandalf i updated, please check again 🙏
@allgandalf i updated
Thanks for updating i will review this tomorrow, working on other high priority PR's today
This has conflicts @daledah
@daledah friendly bump
@allgandalf i updated
I’m under the weather and also reviewing a PR related to Onboarding, so will take the night after that, i will review this tomorrow
@neil-marcellini i updated
@allgandalf since your comments don't relate to the functionality of the code, would you please also test now and hopefully we can get this merged soon? We can fix small things in a follow up if needed.
works for me, starting review now
Reviewer Checklist
- [x] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- [x] I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - [x] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- [x] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - [x] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - [x] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- [x] I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- [x] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- [x] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- [x] Android: Native
- [x] Android: mWeb Chrome
- [x] iOS: Native
- [x] iOS: mWeb Safari
- [x] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- [x] MacOS: Desktop
- [x] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- [x] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - [x] I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - [x] I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- [x] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- [x] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
- [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - [x] The file is named correctly
- [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - [x] Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- [x] If any new file was added I verified that:
- [x] The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
- [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- [x] If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- [x] If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- [x] If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- [x] I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- [x] I added
Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.
- [x] If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - [x] If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c4edf041-7dc8-4154-80a1-72aef9b9bd94
Android: mWeb Chrome
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/19898901-d29b-4dfc-b489-d8ebdd24204f
iOS: Native
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aba3765e-ee22-4724-924e-69cd515d44b0
iOS: mWeb Safari
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/04e1abe6-382d-43e6-a978-679d6b750187
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b40b437a-37dd-4666-ac63-23981fe0c05e
MacOS: Desktop
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e32036a6-662e-4343-98f6-1e32c14d15eb
@neil-marcellini , i guess you have the access to edit the PR description, can you please update the QA steps to:
Precondition: User should have an workspace with all categories Disabled:
- Go to FAB > Track expense.
- Track a manual expense.
- In self-DMClick Categorize it from the actionable whisper.
- Verify that: the workspace without categories isn't an option
Bug
Workspaces with enabled categories are seen twice:
@allgandalf I can't reproduce this bug. Please add detailed steps.
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/171708823/f5a1bda1-7a5f-4819-a9d5-c4835fb257f1
Steps to reproduce:
- Login with new account
- create new workspace
- Disable the categories of the new workspace
- Create another workspace
- Go to FAB and select track expense
- Go to self DM and select the whisper: Categorize it
- Observe that you see the same workspaces with enabled categories appear twice
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/110545952/91b06059-4eb3-431b-85b2-424614275b4c
Bug
Workspaces with enabled categories are seen twice:
@allgandalf This bug also appears in main, it seems unrelated to my PR. Looks like after creating a new workspace, all channels are duplicated, so the suggestions are also duplicated.
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/171708823/7643b060-d4e8-4a2b-a20f-1b7464acfe11
@allgandalf This bug also appears in main, it seems unrelated to my PR. Looks like after creating a new workspace, all channels are duplicated, so the suggestions are also duplicated.
This bug doesn't appear on main @daledah , the video which you attached is on local dev environment, I tested on staging and production the reported bug doesn't appear there:
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/110545952/d6b5a380-5a50-43c8-9d91-cadf0d3d880e
So i guess the bug which is mentioned here is indeed a regression of our PR, can you please take a look at this @daledah 🙏
c.c. @neil-marcellini
@allgandalf can you check with your latest main on local dev environment This video below is from my latest main and we have a bug when creating a new workspace I think our PR code changes aren't related to this bug cc @neil-marcellini
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db8d1380-964b-44e5-a914-1162ad765095
:hand: This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 9.0.7-3 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | success ✅ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |
🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.7-4 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | failure ❌ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |
@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.7-8 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | failure ❌ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | failure ❌ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.8-6 🚀
| platform | result |
|---|---|
| 🤖 android 🤖 | success ✅ |
| 🖥 desktop 🖥 | success ✅ |
| 🍎 iOS 🍎 | success ✅ |
| 🕸 web 🕸 | success ✅ |