Wrap the login page background image in a new container to fix it moving

[shahinyan11]

Details

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/34529 PROPOSAL: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/34529#issuecomment-1894169543

Tests

1. Go to sign in screen
2. Enter email address and press continue
3. Enter a wrong magic code and make sure the background image doesn't move.

• [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as in the Tests section.

• [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• [x] I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• [x] I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • [x] I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • [x] I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • [x] I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • [x] I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • [x] I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• [x] I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • [x] Android: Native
  • [x] Android: mWeb Chrome
  • [x] iOS: Native
  • [x] iOS: mWeb Safari
  • [x] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • [x] MacOS: Desktop
• [x] I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• [x] I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • [x] I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
  • [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • [x] If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • [x] I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
  • [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• [x] I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• [x] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• [x] I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• [x] If any new file was added I verified that:
  • [x] The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
  • [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• [x] If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• [x] If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• [x] If the PR modifies the form input styles:
  • [x] I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • [x] I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
• [x] If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• [x] If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/46921547/bced7f66-c2f5-43af-b702-e049868c26f3

Android: mWeb Chrome

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/46921547/b12f55e9-3439-4a04-b139-95764765b72c

iOS: Native

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/46921547/85c7ba96-3ab8-4d74-a4d9-e8507727821d

iOS: mWeb Safari

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/46921547/215627bf-e40f-4271-82d9-219eb25988f5

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/46921547/cf01be9d-8f0c-4b3e-9e68-1080cc53e5b4

MacOS: Desktop

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/46921547/553e5850-ea1d-465b-9dbe-7071c43e9234

[melvin-bot[bot]]

@hayata-suenaga Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[hayata-suenaga]

asked a contributor plus to review this PR first. Someone will come and review this soon

[shahinyan11]

@aimane-chnaif @hayata-suenaga Please do not did any job on this PR I just added it for my proposal to show what change I suggest . Sorry if i did something wrong

[aimane-chnaif]

@shahinyan11 if you wanna demo, it's fine to create your own branch but don't make PR. Create draft PR at maximum. Don't mark as ready which auto-assigns people.

[shahinyan11]

@aimane-chnaif How to crate draft PR and Don't mark as ready .

[aimane-chnaif]

@aimane-chnaif How to crate draft PR and Don't mark as ready .

https://github.blog/2019-02-14-introducing-draft-pull-requests/

[hayata-suenaga]

is this draft or ready for review?

[s77rt]

@shahinyan11 Next time please do not raise PRs until assigned. Also please fix the PR description and title

[shahinyan11]

@s77rt I made some new changes to preserve the current UI on other platforms because they changed a bit after our changes. Please check them and approve if everything is ok

[s77rt]

@shahinyan11 Please apply the requested changes and explain the bug you are referring to. This PR should only effect one file.

[shahinyan11]

@s77rt Now We have such error on Web small screens

This is because we updated the styles and now here should be used styles.signInBackgroundImage instead styles.signInBackground.
To avoid from changes in other files we can replace the keys in styles which we changed

1. signInBackground to signInBackgroundContainer
2. signInBackgroundImage to signInBackground

[s77rt]

@shahinyan11 We shouldn't be changing any style here. There should be only one change which is to add a wrapping view in SignInPageLayout

[shahinyan11]

@s77rt Adding wrapping view demands changing style of his child. We did that only for IOS. Now the wrapping view has the same styles as his child for all platforms besides IOS. To avoid this we can make the changes I commented.

[s77rt]

The wrapping view shouldn't have the same style as the child. Keep the style of the child untouched.

The wrapping view should be something like that:

                      <View
                            style={[
                                styles.pAbsolute,
                                styles.w100,
                                StyleUtils.getHeight(Math.max(variables.signInContentMinHeight, containerHeight)),
                                StyleUtils.getBackgroundColorStyle(theme.highlightBG),
                            ]}
                        >
                            <BackgroundImage />
                        </View>

[s77rt]

@shahinyan11 Please change the PR title to something more explanatory (what's being changed in the PR) also fix the checklist (the part I linked the correct issue )

[shahinyan11]

@s77rt And what about my comment above related with android bug ?

[s77rt]

@shahinyan11 Can you please clarify which bug? Is there still a reproducible bug here?

[shahinyan11]

We should set {backgroundColor: theme.signInPage} only for IOS to avoid below bug on Android. Android uses another image as the background and the bottom color of that image is different from the bottom color of the image that IOS uses.

@s77rt What do you think about using

StyleUtils.getBackgroundColorStyle(isIOSNative ? theme.signInPage : null)

[s77rt]

@shahinyan11 This seems like a different bug as I can see the three color layers on main. Also, is there a real case where this is reproducible? (besides hard coding a long error)

[shahinyan11]

@s77rt

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/46921547/282070d6-6756-4606-a2d2-787bad70ed39

[shahinyan11]

@s77rt Yes I am agree with you that there is another error too. Actually, there are several bottlenecks

1. What is the point of using different images for IOS and Android which have a different color on the bottom ?
2. Why use gradient layer for a smooth color transition instead LinearGrading ?
3. The gradient layer does not work at all on IOS, and on Android it works poorly (not smoothly).

[s77rt]

Write a util style function (something like codeStyles) to return the correct platform-dependent background.

[s77rt]

Reviewer Checklist

• [X] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• [X] I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• [X] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • [X] I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • [X] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • [X] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • [X] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• [X] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• [X] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• [X] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • [X] Android: Native
  • [X] Android: mWeb Chrome
  • [X] iOS: Native
  • [X] iOS: mWeb Safari
  • [X] MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • [X] MacOS: Desktop
• [X] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• [X] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • [X] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • [X] I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
  • [X] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • [X] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • [X] I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  • [X] I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • [X] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
  • [X] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • [X] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• [X] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• [X] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• [X] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• [X] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• [X] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• [X] If a new component is created I verified that:
  • [X] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • [X] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • [X] The file is named correctly
  • [X] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • [X] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • [X] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • [X] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • [X] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • [X] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• [X] If any new file was added I verified that:
  • [X] The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• [X] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • [X] A similar style doesn't already exist
  • [X] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
• [X] If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• [X] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• [X] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• [X] If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• [X] If the PR modifies the form input styles:
  • [X] I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • [X] I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
• [X] If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• [X] If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• [X] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/16493223/12d4e130-fac8-4d28-a67e-883689e2c868

Android: mWeb Chrome

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/16493223/275ac326-5e67-4277-a9d9-82e32f3ea946

iOS: Native

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/16493223/58ffaa00-aba2-4ac5-ad24-e40d0cb6d312

iOS: mWeb Safari

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/16493223/951bbbc5-538b-44cc-82be-cd6e31993cff

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/16493223/f3433478-5cad-44bc-b216-04935ebe9c5b

MacOS: Desktop

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/16493223/8b29778c-d8d7-4828-b401-cf669d43b6c0

[s77rt]

@shahinyan11 Any updates here?

[s77rt]

@shahinyan11 Try merge main see if it fixes the failing perf test

[OSBotify]

:hand: This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/rlinoz in version: 1.4.40-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	failure ❌

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.40-5 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸	failure ❌