App
App copied to clipboard
[HOLD for payment 2024-02-07] [TS migration] Migrate 'ReportWelcomeMessage' page to TypeScript
TypeScript migration
Make sure you read through our TypeScript's style guide, cheatsheet and PropTypes conversion table before you start working on this migration issue.
Files
Path | Dependencies |
---|---|
src/pages/ReportWelcomeMessagePage.js | 22 |
This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. eroding to Monthly issue.
P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!
@melvin-bot[bot], this Monthly task hasn't been acted upon in 6 weeks; closing.
If you disagree, feel encouraged to reopen it -- but pick your least important issue to close instead.
Hi, I'm Viktoryia from Callstack - expert contributor group - and I would like to work on this issue.
Triggered auto assignment to @Gonals, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.
Triggered auto assignment to @lschurr (NewFeature
), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.
Reviewing
label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".
The solution for this issue has been :rocket: deployed to production :rocket: in version 1.4.34-1 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period :calendar:. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
- https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/34663
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-02-07. :confetti_ball:
BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
- [ ] [@Gonals] Please propose regression test steps to ensure the new feature will work correctly on production in further releases.
- [ ] [@lschurr] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon.
Is there anyone who needs payment for this issue @Gonals? I think just @jjcoffee for reviewing the PR right?
Is there anyone who needs payment for this issue @Gonals? I think just @jjcoffee for reviewing the PR right?
I think so, yep
Skipping the payment summary for this issue since all the assignees are employees or vendors. If this is incorrect, please manually add the payment summary SO.
Payment summary:
- Contributor: @VickyStash is an agency-contributor and not due payment.
- Contributor+: @jjcoffee $250 to be paid in Upwork
Offer sent in Upwork @jjcoffee
@lschurr Thanks, offer accepted!
Payment sent in Upwork. Closing this one out.