App
App copied to clipboard
Expensify
Simplify rows in workspace editor.
Problem
While we've traditionally used a lot of verbiage to describe functionality on OldDot, and related, we have carried that some approach into NewDot, what we've learned is that this ends up obfuscating functionality. In addition, this makes it hard for users to parse a page of features and figure out exactly what's going on. Perhaps just as importantly, the verbs that we're using aren't possible on NewDot, so it makes for a confusing experience given that overall design is intended to educate users on the breadth of our functionality rather than the specific actions they might take.
Solution
Let's simplify the workspace editor by labeling each row by the feature we'd like to educate users about, without confusing them with actions that they may or not take. At a high-level, that brings us a workspace editor with the following rows:
- Settings
- Members
- Cards
- Expenses
- Bills
- Invoices
- Travel
- Bank Account
Or something like that. We can discuss more in open-source, just wanted to create this issue since we've talked about this several times over.
Current assignee @joekaufmanexpensify is eligible for the NewFeature assigner, not assigning anyone new.
@JmillsExpensify or @joekaufmanexpensify please add me to slack groups as i am facing issues while running ios or android apps whereas i am able to run web and desktop applications, please assist so that i can contribute to bugs or features to mobile apps as well, I would be really greatful for your kindselves help, thanks.
@kuluruvineeth Could you please reach out to [email protected] with this request? They'll be able to help with getting access to our Slack channels. There is more detail on this in our contributing guidelines. Thanks!
Not much traction on the discussion I posted in Slack. Bumped in product.
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~013fdb75e4486f21ba
![melvin-bot[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/179547?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor Plus for review of internal employee PR - @sobitneupane (Internal)
Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".
The solution for this issue has been :rocket: deployed to production :rocket: in version 1.3.18-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period :calendar:. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
- https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/19414
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-06-02. :confetti_ball:
After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
- [x] External issue reporter
- [x] Contributor that fixed the issue
- [ ] Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
- Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
- Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty
This is a new feature, so no reporting bonus, and we changed this internally. Only payment here is $1,000 to @sobitneupane for C+ PR review.
Triggered auto assignment to @laurenreidexpensify (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.
Adding an additional BZ assignee as I'm going to be OOO next week (until June 5th). All that's needed here is to pay @sobitneupane on June 2nd (which is when the 7 day regression reporting period ends).
