fix/11427: new design for change password when user is not validated

[tienifr]

Details

When user didn't validate account, we should show resendValidationLink screen

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/11427

Tests

1. Create account in Old dot
2. Click on Free plan inbox card
3. Stop loading redirected page
4. Change host https://new.expensify.com to http://localhost:8080/
5. Navigate to Settings > Security > change password
6. Check UnauthenticatedUser screen and click button Resend validation link
7. Check the error message if Error exist, otherwise success message

• [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Review Checklist

PR Author Checklist

• [x] I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• [x] I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • [x] I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • [x] I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • [x] I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • [x] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• [x] I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• [x] I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • [x] iOS / native
  • [x] Android / native
  • [x] iOS / Safari
  • [x] Android / Chrome
  • [x] MacOS / Chrome
  • [x] MacOS / Desktop
• [x] I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• [x] I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • [x] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • [x] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • [x] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • [x] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
  • [x] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
  • [x] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • [x] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• [x] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• [x] I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• [x] I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• [x] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• [x] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• [x] If a new component is created I verified that:
  • [x] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • [x] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • [x] The file is named correctly
  • [x] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • [x] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • [x] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • [x] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • [x] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • [x] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• [x] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • [x] A similar style doesn't already exist
  • [x] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
• [x] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• [x] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• [x] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

• [ ] I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• [ ] I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• [ ] I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • [ ] I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • [ ] I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • [ ] I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • [ ] I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• [ ] I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• [ ] I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • [ ] iOS / native
  • [ ] Android / native
  • [ ] iOS / Safari
  • [ ] Android / Chrome
  • [ ] MacOS / Chrome
  • [ ] MacOS / Desktop
• [ ] If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• [ ] I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • [ ] I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • [ ] I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • [ ] I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • [ ] I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
  • [ ] I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
  • [ ] I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • [ ] I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• [ ] If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• [ ] I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• [ ] I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• [ ] I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• [ ] I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• [ ] If a new component is created I verified that:
  • [ ] A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • [ ] All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • [ ] Any functional components have the displayName property
  • [ ] The file is named correctly
  • [ ] The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • [ ] The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • [ ] For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • [ ] Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • [ ] All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • [ ] The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• [ ] If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • [ ] A similar style doesn't already exist
  • [ ] The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
• [ ] If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• [ ] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• [ ] I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

QA Steps

1. Create account in Old dot
2. Click on Free plan inbox card
3. Navigate to Settings > Security > change password
4. Check UnauthenticatedUser screen and click button Resend validation link
5. Check the error message if Error exist, otherwise success message

• [x] Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Screenshots

Web

Mobile Web - Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Desktop

iOS

Android

[rushatgabhane]

@tienifr just a note for future PRs: when creating a PR, please make a draft PR if you aren't filling all the details like Fixed issue. Or ofc, you can add all the details when PR is opened.

Why is this important? If a PR is created without linking the issue, PullBear asks any random C+ and CME for a review.

[rushatgabhane]

@luacmartins could you please assign us as reviewers and unassign everyone else?

[tienifr]

@rushatgabhane Sorry about that. I'll keep that in my mind. Thanks

[tienifr]

@rushatgabhane I've updated my PR. I changed to use Form component, and updated texts as https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/11427#issuecomment-1293843676 and create new page as https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/12032#discussion_r1004794608. Pls help check. Thanks

[luacmartins]

@rushatgabhane let me know once you are done testing!

[tienifr]

@luacmartins Thanks for your review. I've change my PR, but there are some points that we need to discuss more, pls let me know what you think?

[luacmartins]

@tienifr addressed your comments

[tienifr]

@luacmartins I've updated my PR, pls help check again. Thanks.

[rushatgabhane]

@tienifr @luacmartins sorry for the delay, reviewing today

[luacmartins]

@tienifr did you get a chance to address my other comments?

[tienifr]

@luacmartins I thought I resolved all your comments. Pls let me know if I miss something

[luacmartins]

@tienifr ah nice! sorry, I missed that. Just left a couple more comments, before I start testing.

[tienifr]

@luacmartins Oh my bad, I've updated my PR. Thanks for pointing that out

[rushatgabhane]

@tienifr could you please resolve the merge conflicts

[luacmartins]

@tienifr I'll test once the merge conflict is resolved!

[tienifr]

@rushatgabhane @luacmartins I've resolved the conflict

[luacmartins]

@tienifr please avoid force pushing commits. It makes it hard to follow the commit history and it can be confusing for reviewers.

[luacmartins]

As per this comment, this PR is no longer needed. I'll close this and we will move forward with compensation on the respective issue. Thanks for the work @tienifr!