amr-wind
amr-wind copied to clipboard
Actuator Disk TODO's
- [x] Remove density as an actuator specific input #640
- [x] Default num_blades to 3 for Joukowksy #635
- [x] Consolidate syntax for
num_points_r
#635 - [x] Input as TSR or RPM instead of omega #645
- [x] Output TSR in ncfile #635
- [ ] Make it work with mesh mapping #647
- [ ] Create file reads for the table of look up quantities
- [x] Add
f_theta
andf_z
output to ncfile #635 - [x] Add a "reasonable" default for
vortex_core_size
(Maybe 10-15% of rotor diameter?) #645 - [ ] Add a "disktype" flag to ncfile output.
- [x] Add power output to ncfile #666
- [ ] Add power calculation for UnifCtDisk (see @michaeljbrazell branch for a version of the calculation, maybe generalize it)
- [ ] Add time-history of turbine yaw output to ncfile (c.f. yaw controller changes from HFM Q4)
@neilmatula and I are realizing that the actuator_src_term[x,y]
output is dependent on mesh resolution, which makes it hard to compare against literature. So I added f_theta
and f_z
output to this list to help with validation.
Lawrence
Sorry, adding one more minor thing to the list. Since it seems like vortex_core_size
has an impact on the comparisons (at least with Sorensen's cases), we should probably give it a reasonable value to start with if people don't have any idea what it should be.
Lawrence
And one more minor thing while I'm thinking about it. Was just thinking it would be handy to include a diskType
flag to the ncfile to indicate whether it's a UniformCtDisk
or JoukowskyDisk
type. Just a minor convenience thing, but I might use it in the postprocessing scripts so I can tell whether to expect things like TSR output or not.
Lawrence
@neilmatula and @ndevelder can you update anything you've done on this issue?
@psakievich Done! I checked the Input TSR and vortex_core_size boxes.
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity.
@psakievich, @neilmatula, @lawrenceccheung do we still need to keep this open? I see a bunch has been done already.