calcite-design-system
calcite-design-system copied to clipboard
Epic: Updates to Color Picker
Description
The design phase for adding alpha channel support to Color Picker (issue #749) proposed additional improvements that were intended to be tackled after the initial alpha channel support was implemented. This issue is to document the remaining tasks to complete. cc: @fr
Acceptance Criteria
- [x] https://github.com/Esri/calcite-design-system/issues/9412
- [ ] https://github.com/Esri/calcite-design-system/issues/9413
- Update the internal borders inside channels input to be border-3.
- [ ] https://github.com/Esri/calcite-design-system/issues/9415
- [ ] https://github.com/Esri/calcite-design-system/issues/9414
Relevant Info
For full details, updated Figma file can be found here.
Historical screenshots of first pass on design below. Updated mocks are available in the associated issues above.
Which Component
Color Picker
Example Use Case
No response
Priority impact
impact - p2 - want for an upcoming milestone
Esri team
Calcite (design)
@macandcheese @SkyeSeitz The above comment has been updated to reflect the changes we discussed.
Note, the square color field above should have the lowest priority. Will need feedback from teams as it may have adverse affects on layouts.
Maybe a way for users to customize height of color graph? The square ones end up being significantly “taller” than previously - perhaps height graph prop for S/M/L? I think using css vars not possible with the color graph.
The previous heights are probably more expected, having it square just adds “more granular choice” to the graph but not sure that is actually needed.
Yeah I could see that working well.