Erik Bjäreholt

I had the same issue in CI: https://github.com/NeuroTechX/eeg-notebooks/runs/5690930290 I updated PsychoPy to the latest version in https://github.com/NeuroTechX/eeg-notebooks/pull/167, which solved the issue. Note however that: 1. In its place there's a...

@gbernal Thanks for that, I updated to latest Psychopy in #167 so at least that shouldn't be an issue anymore.

Hey @oreHGA I had to revert that PR, so we're still on an old version of psychopy.

@JadinTredup I got this PR in an almost mergeable state. The only thing left is to patch the FreeEEG32 stuff that was added after I forked `eegnb/devices` (see top comment...

Pushed an incomplete merge commit. Needs fixing (and careful review).

@JohnGriffiths @JadinTredup Looks like delaying this made the conflicts a lot worse... I tried to do my best to clean it up, but some issues left and it's 6PM here,...

>Has not been tested besides compiling, so that needs to be done once whilst I work towards incorporating the rest of the experiments. I think you should definitely focus on...

I also just fixed so that CI runs on PRs targeting develop, so if you rebase/merge in those changes you should get CI to run.

@oreHGA The reason is probably due to an unmarked Markers column which starts outputting data at the 15th sample, see: https://github.com/NeuroTechX/eeg-notebooks/issues/108

Did you also add a header "Marker1" or such? On Sun, Jun 20, 2021, 12:24 andraderenew ***@***.***> wrote: > I added 14 zeros(which I figured is what could fix this...