WorldGuard icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
WorldGuard copied to clipboard

Horse-Protection

Open LadyCailinBot opened this issue 10 years ago • 11 comments

WORLDGUARD-3553 - Reported by LordRazen

I was wondering why you cant hurt entities on other regions but why you can steal items from horses. Is there a way to change this easily in the default-config (not in a flag since we cant put the same flag on every new region).

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 09 '15 08:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by wizjany

this seems to be a more complex issue than might first appear. a horse doesn't really belong to a region like a chest might. for comparison, chest minecarts aren't protected either.

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 09 '15 10:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by PseudoKnight

Do you think it's within WorldGuard's purview to offer a horse protection option based on the horse's owner? I've done something like this on my server (and set "ride allow" on global), but it seems to me it would be a reasonable addition to WG. Also, none of the horse plugins (last I looked) had just simple horse protection without tons of unnecessary features.

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 09 '15 16:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by LordRazen

Not sure if that counts but from my points of view it's something that would fit worldguard: keep damage from entities (already done), and keep away the possibility to take saddle, armor or chests (inventory-stuff). Riding should be possible on other regions in my opinion since if that's disabled you wont be able to ride in 99% of all parts of the server beside your own - would destroy the featuure (an config-option might be helpful here).

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 09 '15 17:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by PseudoKnight

Could allow owners of tameable mobs region bypass for entity interaction.

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 09 '15 18:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by LordRazen

Is that a suggestion for me to use WG or for you to change WG?

My suggestion would be the following: Add options for the interaction with entities which got an inventory in the config - so: allow-horse-inventory-interact-on-region: yes/no allow-horse-riding-start-on-region: yes/no (means you can start riding a horse. if you sit on it already it's fine) allow-minecart-inventory-interact-on-region: yes/no There you can set the default, because flags are no real option here if you have to work with around 2000 regions.

I can think of some more options in that way, but it makes only sence to post them if you agree with this...

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 09 '15 18:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by wizjany

veto. too many config options and too confusing.

there are literally two things going on here:

  1. riding animals in protected regions: handled by ride flag already
  2. accessing inventory of animals(+chest charts?):
  • can be either done based on owner, ignoring regions completely (works as a single config option, doesn't work for chest carts)
  • or be done based on the region the horse is in, which is a bit more dangerous since people would be able to steal things by moving the horse around if you leave it unfenced.

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 09 '15 20:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by LordRazen

2b seems the best here - inventory save based on regions.

WG protects all block-inventories by default. So if you try to open a chest it's blocked, so why not doing this for entity-inventorys, too?

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 09 '15 23:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by sk89q

I think protecting horse inventories based on who owns the horse is the best approach for horses. I'm surprised horses aren't protected already actually -- I must have missed horse inventories when I redid all the protection code a few months ago (or maybe the API wasn't quite there at the time? I dunno).

Actually, I thought all entities WERE protected because WG blocked all right clicks of entities? Was this changed?

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 10 '15 03:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by wizjany

actually that's a good point i forgot about - afaik WG still blocks entity interaction unless it's a villager.

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 10 '15 04:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by sk89q

If that's the case, we wouldn't have this report though?

Err actually we would for horses since there wouldn't be a special exception for horses. Or maybe ride is handled as "any right click" of horses... I forget

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 10 '15 06:08 LadyCailinBot

Comment by wizjany

i was under the impression that was a different event...will need to look into it.

LadyCailinBot avatar Aug 10 '15 09:08 LadyCailinBot