Emmanuel Pacaud

Please test #709 In this pull request, the port range is hardcoded to [10000..10010], so `-p 10000-10010:10000-10010` should be enough.

It is most probably unrelated, unless destination port is the same for the 2 cameras, which should not happen. What say the lines `🅸 stream> [GvStream::stream_new] Destination stream port` ?

Yes, please.

Back to this issue, with my branch, are you able to connect to a camera using its name instead of the IP address ?

@wuhaochen Did you try #709 ? Aravis should reuse the same port if the source IP is different. At least that is what I have seen during my tests.

Is there enough bandwidth for the 2 streams ? Did you adjust with the inter packet delay ? Could you also enable gstreamer debugging output using GST_DEBUG ?

> > Is there enough bandwidth for the 2 streams ? > > `nload` shows that single camera consumes ~410 MBit/s without any issues, while two cameras consume ~820 MBit/s...

How are you testing ? What gives `ARV_DEBUG=all ./tests/arv-auto-packet-size-test` ?

It is not clear to me what you have done. Did you run `ARV_DEBUG=all arv-auto-packet-size-test` with the change in this merge request ? In your application, did you try to...

Thanks.