EmelyanenkoK

I want to emphasize some aspects of @dariotarantini proposal: 1) each wTON wallet works as minter/burner itself - no need for additional interaction with minter which means one or even...

> This assume that, if you are interacting with another contract, the receiver contract will forward the payload in the next transaction. Some may not; that's why I proposed an...

@markokhman I just want to say that I'm not going to polish my implementation till release quality. It was done to check the idea, I hope that if you embrace...

I guess next step is explicit listing of additional functionality such as - external transfer (it is when you send TON directly to wton-wallet of receiver to wrap it in-place...

Closed in favor of #592

I find this standard well though and ready to be accepted. Earlier, I put off discussing the proposal because it was born out of the needs of a single ecosystem...

It is unlikely we will allow to run shell commands from fift: 1. fift is good as DSL, but not that handy for general purposes 2. since it's syntax/logic is...

@blocknodehub seems like you are using slow disks. We recommend to use NVM SSD. @ianlapinskii where you this error? http-ton-api?

Indeed, this should be fixed

@blocknodehub well, logs explicitly mentioned that operations (most of them disk intensive) are slow. Note, that for now IOPS are more important that overall read/write speed measured in bytes/sec. @ianlapinskii...