Electrocutor

> ye I do not think we should generate thousands of inventory listeners to support vanilla's recipe unlock system, there are better mods to use instead when gating recipes As...

> > Well, we should potentially remove them then, not sure what their overhead is. > > I don't agree at all with this. > This is a specific feature...

#1 it would prevent the chaos that is every modder trying to come up with the correct name for FOR to make sure their patch ends up in the right...

Example of FOR chaos: Vens part data is "VenStockRevamp" Vens model path patch is FOR "zzzVSRPathPatch" So I had to add a FOR to my TU patch named "zzzzTUStock" to...

"Having patches apply in a non-deterministic way worries me." This would not be the case. They would be alphabetical if no BEFORE/AFTER were specified and they would always be after...

Key Points - FOR specifies the patch name and determines alphabetical order within other identical constraints - - f.e. :FOR[a]:AFTER[z] would happen before :FOR[b]:AFTER[z] - - f.e. :FOR[a]:AFTER[z] would happen...