Add new overload for reweight action that tracks likelihood

[JesusSilvaUtrera]

Proposed changes

Closes #524. Changes include a new overload for the reweight action, tracking likelihood as well and storing it in the particle structure if there is a member for it.

Type of change

• [ ] 🐛 Bugfix (change which fixes an issue)
• [x] 🚀 Feature (change which adds functionality)
• [ ] 📚 Documentation (change which fixes or extends documentation)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. This is simply a reminder of what we will require before merging your code.

• [x] Lint and unit tests (if any) pass locally with my changes
• [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• [x] I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)
• [x] All commits have been signed for DCO

Additional comments

Anything worth mentioning to the reviewers.

[JesusSilvaUtrera]

I am open to discussions about implementation, because @hidmic had the idea of using a view for the likelihood for example, but I wasn't so sure about that (that would mean to create the view before calling the action and passing it as argument, wouldn't it?).

Also, while researching about C++20 features for this, I found the 'concepts' feature, and I think that would be a good refactor for the templates restrictions.

[hidmic]

Also, while researching about C++20 features for this, I found the 'concepts' feature, and I think that would be a good refactor for the templates restrictions.

When and if we switch to C++20, yes.