Léo Gaspard

As far as I understand, `#![forbid()]` lints only work on the current crate, not on dependencies. However, they do work for sub-modules that cannot `#![allow()]` them again.

We were discussing in https://github.com/sanpii/todo-txt/issues/5, and there seems to be an issue about URLs and tags in the current specification. Should `visit https://example.org` be handled as task `visit` with tag...

I personally much rather edit ```todo.txt (A) Say hello ``` to ```json {"priority":"A","text":"Say hello"} ``` especially as JSON is that fragile (no trailing comma, never forget the quotes…). Anyway, I...

I've just come upon this issue, while looking for a way to avoid having some gross code that simply doesn't want to go away (actually it's slowly increasing, started at...

Oh indeed good point, thanks! Just opened #2414 to track this separate feature, as I wasn't able to find any other open issue|RFC for it :)

For the record, similar ideas have already been discussed before stabilization of the `Future` trait -- not saying this against this proposal, though… quite the contrary, actually, I'm all in...

This would mean integrating a WebAssembly interpreter in cargo. Possible, but will require quite some work.

Well, the issue is this header is [this one](https://github.com/AravisProject/aravis/blob/master/src/arvgcstructentrynode.h#L26), which has the protection to make it so that only `arv.h` is allowed to include it, and the `arv.h` I get...

Hmm weird, the thing previously looked like: ```xml … ``` I added `disguised="1"` below the `abstract="1"`, reran `gir`, and things just failed the same way, with a call to `sizeof`...

Thank you for your answers! Just opened https://github.com/AravisProject/aravis/pull/304, let's see how that moves :)