[@effect/vitest] it.effect.prop.only

[dmmulroy]

What is the problem this feature would solve?

i can't currently only run an effectful property test as .only does not exist on it.effect.prop

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

adding .only to it.effect.prop

What alternatives have you considered?

No response

[stevebluck]

It's part of the last config argument to .prop if I am not mistaken: { only: true } but I agree a .only would be nice.