Nathaniel van Diepen
Nathaniel van Diepen
@eregen were you able to get further?
@eregen poke? I will be closing this in a couple of weeks if there is no response, as I assume it's resolved.
As there has been no update since this was opened in April, I'm closing this as stale. Feel free to open it again if you are still having issues.
@mrichards42 do you have plans to add an application icon still?
> I believe the change in checksum is related to https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/45830 The file downloaded is a release artifact, not the automated `.tar.gz` source archive that github provides. The timeline for...
> Do you happen to have the old version of this file (with `cbbed4e69567871462464049646dc11fdad8b8c75fde5d75856068c2cfbd2d38` sha256sum)? I do not. > Github shows that this file was uploaded on Oct 22, 2023:...
> There is also a possibility that your build system calculated the checksum incorrectly. Since I get the sha256sum by hand and feed it into the build system, this would...
I'm currently struggling with getting the sanity check of the build process to work, as changes to the github runners seem to have broken things. Trying to fix any of...
Well, I have figured out why the build probably worked despite the sha256sum not matching. Here is the code that raises the error if it's not valid: https://github.com/toltec-dev/toltec/blob/b19ecf36f92d6cf2b8e900bcc2896314e51bb816/scripts/toltec/builder.py#L222 ```python if...
Duplicates #363