Eduardo Eyras

Yes, thanks for your willingness to test it! E On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 23:15, OgnjenMilicevic wrote: > Thanks! > > I am looking at around 20 samples total...

Hi, Please use the "classical" test (based on Mann-Whitney or paired Wilcoxon test, you have both options) to make this comparison. We are still trying to change the "empirical" test...

Thanks, what did you try exactly? The error seems from scipy, perhaps too many zeros or NA's? E. On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 19:11, biocoreexpert wrote: > I tried...

Did you run the wilcoxon test? Are these true zeroes (PI=0) or NA's? E. On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 22:59, biocoreexpert wrote: > It seems to be a warning...

Hi, it seems there is a problem with the format in the expression file. Did you check that the format is as expected by SUPPA? Thanks E. On Thu, 4...

Hi, Thanks for the email maybe it's a thing of python 3.5? With 3.4 should be ok E On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 19:31, luhan125 wrote: > Hi, >...

Hi If you changed some parameters for the run, it could give you different results. But suppa is deterministic, and given the input and and the parameters, it will always...

Hi Austin, thanks for your message. I think it could be simpler than what you propose. > > I have about 340 RNA seq data sets, what do you recommend...

Hi Austin, SUPPA uses the events calculated from the annotation, and this would be fixed across all samples. Which events are expressed (different from nan) and what are their inclusion...

Hi, > Why would I be getting multiple events called on the same gene? > Events are local variation of splicing, so they may detectable in different regions of the...